Police officers arrived on scene and issued a citation charging Verkerk with driving while impaired and driving with a revoked license.
Verkerk served on the Chapel Hill Town Council between December 2001 and December 2005.
In July 2012, Verkerk and her attorney, Matthew Suczynski, filed a motion to have any evidence obtained as a result of stopping her vehicle suppressed on the grounds that the stop was a violation of her Fourth Amendment right against illegal search and seizure.
“From a moral standpoint, (Shatley) did the right thing,” Suczynski said. “I believe professor Verkerk would say the same — it’s just a question of whether or not criminal consequences should flow from that.”
Verkerk said she thought firefighters are not trained to perform traffic stops, which can be dangerous.
“Traffic stops are one of the most dangerous things that police do,” Verkerk said in a telephone interview Wednesday. “God forbid, what if I had had a gun?”
Superior Court Judge Elaine Bushfan ultimately denied Verkerk’s request to suppress the evidence obtained during the traffic stop.
According to the appeals case document, Verkerk entered a negotiated plea in September 2012, pleading guilty to driving while impaired under the condition that the state would voluntarily dismiss the driving with a revoked license charge.
The authority
The court of appeals reviewed the case and ordered a new hearing to determine whether Shatley acted as a government official or as a private citizen when he stopped Verkerk, and whether the stop and citation issued by police were legal.
“Firefighters, according to the Chapel Hill town ordinances, are allowed to act as police officers in very limited circumstances — basically when responding to a fire and somebody interferes with that,” Suczynski said.
“Lt. Shatley didn’t have the authority to use the firetruck to cause a traffic stop.”
To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.
Suczysnki said the N.C. Supreme Court will decide whether the case will be heard in the next 60 days. Until then, Verkerk’s DWI charge has been vacated.
Curt Varone, a practicing attorney and a former deputy assistant fire chief in Providence, R.I., said the case raises important concerns about the legal rights of firefighters.
“If you ask, ‘should firefighters run around apprehending drivers for traffic violations?’ — obviously the answer is no,” Varone said.
“But if a firefighter sees an impaired driver and that driver is a hazard to other people and the firefighter has the tools to safely apprehend that person, is it illegal for the firefighter to do that? It’s a complex problem.”
Varone said while he does not think firefighters should be encouraged to perform traffic stops, they should not be punished for doing so in the name of public safety.
“I think if you ask someone who’s lost a loved one to a drunk driver whether or not, two minutes before the accident, a firetruck officer should have done something to try to apprehend that driver, I think you know what the answer’s going to be.”
city@dailytarheel.com