The primary goal of the proposal is to make the curriculum, implemented in 1980, less fragmented.
"Any curriculum that was geared towards the needs of the students more than 20 years ago is naturally not what we're going to need today," said Laurie McNeil, chairwoman of the curriculum review. "We had a sound ship, but we had to scrape a lot of barnacles off the hull."
The main way the committee plans to integrate the curriculum is by having a connections component, which would apply foundational skills to students' majors or minors and connect students' education outside the classroom.
"One of the things we were aware of is that we live in a more global world than 20 years ago," McNeil said.
The connections courses would include three courses related to global citizenship, a U.S. diversity class to replace the cultural diversity requirement, one communications class, one language integration class, one quantitative class and one experiential education class.
Students could receive credit for the experiential education component through such things as service-learning, fieldwork, an internship or study abroad.
The proposed curriculum would reduce general education requirements from 44 to 42 hours and Arts and Sciences perspectives from 12 to nine hours.
Many courses could count as both a connections course and as an elective or major or minor credit. The courses specifically designated as only connections classes would not count toward required general college hours.
The proposal also tries to get rid of fragmentation in the system by eliminating requirements that the committee thought were unnecessary.