While President Bush and Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry are quick to criticize each other's tactics on homeland security, their platforms on how best to keep the nation safe are largely similar.
But with the Nov. 2 general election less than a month away, both candidates are making a final push to persuade voters that theirs is the best path for homeland security.
"Both candidates are in favor of doing more (to protect America)," said Mac Destler, professor of public policy at the University of Maryland. "Bush says that we have done a lot, and Kerry says we haven't done enough."
The Kerry campaign claims that Bush underfunded homeland security, which left first responders lacking in essential equipment.
In a recent press release, Kerry promised to deploy the resources the nation's cities and first responders need to protect their people and to safeguard chemical and nuclear plants and mass transit systems.
Kerry also stated that he will secure all loose nuclear weapons in the former Soviet Union within four years and seek a ban on the production of materials for these weapons.
"Kerry will make homeland security a real priority with real resources and stronger safeguards against attack," Ashley Turton, spokeswoman for N.C. Victory 2004, stated in the press release.
The Republican Party has a similar plan for a safer America and contends that impressive progress has been made, including the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.
The party platform presents plans to establish a National Counterterrorism Center to serve as the government's pool of known and suspected terrorists.