Theresa Newman, Duke law professor and faculty adviser of the Duke Law Innocence Project, an organization combating wrongful convictions, helped overturn Armstrong’s sentence. She said the DLIP aims to erase the idea the sentence delivered has to be the end of the case.
“We want to examine the way that the cloak of innocence disappears once a person is convicted,” she said. “It is better that 10 guilty persons go free than one innocent person suffer.”
There have been an estimated 2,000 innocent people wrongfully incarcerated in the past 25 years, Bermudez said.
He spent 18 years behind bars after being wrongly identified by multiple witnesses in what he called an illegal interrogation procedure.
“I just believed that if I told the truth I would go free,” he said.
He appealed his conviction 10 times before he was released, after writing to representatives, reading up on the legal system and turning down a plea bargain.
“I didn’t want to make a deal with the devil,” he said, though many encouraged him to take it.
He eventually received a record-breaking settlement from the state of New York and is working to create the Fernando Bermudez Innocence Scholarship, which will give thousands of dollars in scholarships to students who promise to work to help the wrongfully convicted.
It took Armstrong five years to stop believing he would be found innocent.
“I thought that the system doesn’t have time to play with people’s lives and put innocent people in prison,” he said.
UNC junior Jessica Loverde said she didn’t know the extent of wrongful convictions’ prevalence in the U.S.
“I attended the seminar to learn something new and learned about a problem that is happening all over,” she said.
Bermudez and Armstrong give talks to audiences to educate people on the prevalence and danger of wrongful conviction.
“My story is not just my story, it’s the story of the innocent and what we suffer to get our story out there,” Bermudez said.