The Daily Tar Heel
Printing news. Raising hell. Since 1893.
Thursday, May 2, 2024 Newsletters Latest print issue

We keep you informed.

Help us keep going. Donate Today.
The Daily Tar Heel

Column: What we can learn from this year’s lack of meaningful immigration reform

daca 2.jpg

Many of Trump's policies, including his attempts to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, pose a direct threat to immigrants and international students.

As we look back on 2023, there were many times when immigration seemed to dominate the headlines of major newspapers. This prevalence of immigration discourse in the media is likely due in part to controversial immigration legislation. 

But, what actually happened with immigration on a governmental level this year? And more importantly, what can we learn from this year to help us more effectively address immigration issues in years to come?

In short, 2023 was not a year of landmark immigration reform. Policies from both political parties tended to focus on short-term solutions. For example, on Jan. 5, the White House announced plans to extend parole to Haitians, Cubans and Nicaraguans. Parole is a meaningful step toward providing undocumented immigrants the ability to legally remain in the U.S., but it is still not an immigration status and falls short of addressing underlying issues within the immigration system. 

A couple of months later came the long-anticipated end of Title 42, a Trump-era immigration restriction that was implemented on the grounds of preventing the spread of COVID-19. With the lifting of this restriction, the Department of Homeland Security expected a surge in migration that the “outdated system [was] not designed to handle.”

To address the expected surge, the government introduced even more band-aid solutions. These solutions came in the form of a five-year ban on applying for asylum for illegal border crossings, a rule requiring migrants to first seek asylum in another country and the Secure the Border Act of 2023, which aimed to increase border security. 

What was crucially missing from immigration policy in 2023 was meaningful reform. 

Kaci Bishop, a clinical professor of law and director of the Immigration Clinic at UNC, said that Congress has “not passed any reform for many, many years” and there are many aspects of the immigration system that “need attention.” 

Bishop acknowledged that short-term solutions, such as temporary work permissions can have positive impacts. For example, these programs give immigrants legal employment authorization and increased stability because they can’t be removed from the country. 

Bishop also highlighted problems that may arise if immigrants do not have long-term legal statuses. “There’s no guarantee that TPS will be renewed,” she said. “There’s no guarantee that parole or deferred action would be renewed.” If these programs aren’t renewed, people who give their information to authorities to obtain these statuses are put at the mercy of immigration enforcement. Donald Trump, the Republican frontrunner for the 2024 presidential election, has promised to crack down on immigration, making this scenario all the more plausible. 

Bishop also worries that short-term fixes give people the false sense that their work is finished.

Permanent legal statuses also have more favorable economic effects than temporary work permissions. “When individuals have more certainty that they’re going to be able to reap the benefits of certain decisions long term, they can be more likely to make investments in things like education, in putting down roots in a community,”  Robert McDonough, an Assistant Teaching Professor of Economics, said.

McDonough added that employers know they will be able to maximize productive capacity if they have time to train their employees. Thus, permanent statuses can increase the productive capacity of the American labor force. 

Even still, some organizations advocate for temporary work permissions. Mario Alfaro, a Legislative Liaison and Program Coordinator at El Centro Hispano, a nonprofit that advocates for the Latino community, said that the organization acknowledges the difficulty of passing immigration reform through Congress. This is why El Centro Hispano lobbied the White House for the expansion of TPS and parole at the Here to Work National Summit and Work Permits for All March and Rally on Nov. 14 and 15.  

Alfaro said that TPS can give advocates “time to keep fighting for immigration reform.” 

“We know it’s only for a short period of time, it’s temporary, it’s not the final solution, but it’s a relief,” Alfaro said. “At least it’s something.”

At the end of 2023, we are at an impasse in immigration legislation that could worsen, depending on the results of the 2024 elections. Looking toward the upcoming year, we can acknowledge that while temporary work permissions can be helpful in the short term, we should ultimately be working toward comprehensive immigration reform. 

@dthopinion | opinion@dailytarheel.com

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.

Special Print Edition
The Daily Tar Heel's Collaborative Mental Health Edition