The Daily Tar Heel

Serving the students and the University community since 1893

Tuesday June 6th

Column: When considering Carrboro paid parking, it doesn't have to be all or nothing

Board of Aldermen candidate Matt Clements shares his view on potential parking changes

Matt Clements is running Carrboro Board of Aldermen.

The OC Voice is a portion of the OC Report newsletter where local residents may have a platform to talk about local issues they care about. Matthew Clements is running for the Carrboro Board of Aldermen in the fall. 

Carrboro’s Mayor and Board of Aldermen have opened up a discussion of implementing paid parking in the town. Parking availability has long been a contentious point in regional politics. Chapel Hill has invested in modern parking meters, a paid-parking app and stringent enforcement of public parking.

Carrboro, however, has avoided instituting paid parking and offers municipal lots and on-street parking for visitors. However, the underlying issue of private parking lots engaging in restrictive or predatory parking enforcement is prevalent in downtown Carrboro. 

For instance, UNC has a lot behind the Armadillo Grill that is gated and restricted after business hours. Other private lots employ predatory towing practices instead of welcoming visitors to Carrboro. The town council needs to bring the community together to ensure there is a discussion on how to create a win-win proposition where property owners are able to work together for a common goal - the good of the town and its residents and visitors.

The upcoming 203 Project that will displace a significant portion of the town’s centrally located parking is smartly planning for the future and may decide to put a paid parking garage into the equation. Paid parking options are a voluntary choice by consumers to use and/or limit the town’s resources.

Some argue that paid parking is an all-or-nothing proposition. 

“We’re nervous about creating any kind of structured parking, if we go that far, which would be paid parking, without then really having to come up with a mechanism for our other lots,” said Carrboro Mayor Lydia Lavelle. “Because then everyone will just park in the free lots.”

Perhaps a better alternative is to have a public-private initiative to allow local businesses to give vouchers to their customers for the new parking lot while retaining free parking in the remainder of the town. This option could keep enforcement costs to a minimum while providing a service to town business customers.

There are positive and negative repercussions of each path that Carrboro can take. The town-owned real estate could be generating revenues for the town if the paid parking plan is frugal and self funding. Spending more money chasing revenues while driving customers into other more convenient options outside of Carrboro is unacceptable.

Out-of-town visitors to Carrboro have told me they appreciate the options of free parking with minimal hassles in our town, and patronize our restaurants and business more frequently than Chapel Hill or downtown Durham because of the ease and affordability of parking. The goodwill of visitors outside of our community should not be discounted.

Our town government should not pick and choose winners and losers in any project. Investing in a communal resource that could pay a dividend for the taxpayers of Carrboro residential and business owners equally.

If you live in Orange County and want to make your voice heard on something you care about locally, email

To get the day's news and headlines in your inbox each morning, sign up for our email newsletters.


The Daily Tar Heel Women's Tennis Victory Paper

Special Print Edition

Games & Horoscopes

Print Edition Games Archive